TL;DR

The liquidity-to-acquisition ratio is how you divide your token launch budget between pool liquidity (creating a tradeable market) and buying your own token (acquiring supply ownership). A 70/30 ratio means 70% of the budget goes to pool liquidity and 30% goes to buying tokens. This single slider is the most consequential parameter in a token launch: it controls the tradeoff between liquidity and founder ownership.

How It Works

This is the most important decision in the Token Launch Simulator, and arguably in any DEX token launch. You have one budget. You need it to do two things: create a functioning market and give you a stake in your own token.

Consider a $25,000 budget with a 70/30 split. $17,500 goes into the liquidity pool (paired with tokens), creating a ~$35,000 pool (both sides). $7,500 goes into buying tokens from that pool. After the buy, you own some percentage of the supply and the pool is slightly deeper (because your $7,500 in base asset stayed in the pool).

Now compare 60/40 with the same $25,000. $15,000 goes to liquidity (creating a ~$30,000 pool, 14% shallower). $10,000 goes to the buy, giving 33% more buying power. You own more tokens, but the pool provides worse execution for every future trader.

And at 80/20: $20,000 to liquidity (a ~$40,000 pool, 14% deeper than 70/30). Only $5,000 for buying: 33% less. The pool is healthier, but your ownership stake is smaller.

The tradeoff is non-linear. The acquisition buy itself has price impact: each dollar of buying pushes the price up, making subsequent dollars less efficient. At a 50/50 split, the acquisition buy is so large relative to the pool that significant price impact occurs during the buy itself. At 90/10, the buy is small enough to have minimal impact.

What many founders don’t realize is that the “right” ratio depends on the budget level. A $10,000 budget probably needs 80/20 because even 80% of $10,000 creates a fairly thin pool. A $100,000 budget can afford 60/40 because 60% of $100,000 ($60,000) still creates reasonable depth. The ratio that works at one budget level may not work at another.

Try It Yourself

Drag the liquidity slider and watch everything change: the Token Launch Simulator’s most powerful feature is seeing how the ratio affects liquidity, slippage at every trade size, supply ownership, and price appreciation simultaneously. Try 60/40, then 70/30, then 80/20, then push all the way to 90/10 or 100/0 (no acquisition) and compare the results panels. The full 0 to 100% range is available. Try the Token Launch Simulator →

Related Concepts

• TGE Capital Allocation: The total budget that gets split by this ratio
• Supply Ownership: Directly determined by the acquisition side of the ratio
• Liquidity: Directly determined by the liquidity side of the ratio
• Price Impact: The acquisition buy’s price impact depends on how much budget is on each side
• Liquidity Pool: Where the liquidity portion is deposited

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the liquidity-to-acquisition ratio?

The liquidity-to-acquisition ratio is the percentage split of your launch budget between two purposes: liquidity provision (the capital deposited into the DEX pool alongside your tokens) and token acquisition (the capital used to buy your own token from the pool after creation). A 70/30 ratio means 70% goes to the pool and 30% is used to buy tokens.

What ratio should I use for my token launch?

There’s no single optimal ratio: it depends on your priorities. Higher liquidity (80/20, 90/10, or even 100/0) creates deeper pools with lower slippage, which is better for trader experience. Higher acquisition (50/50 or 60/40) gives the founder more supply ownership, which might be important for governance or signaling commitment. The Token Launch Simulator supports the full 0 to 100% range so you can compare any ratio and see the concrete tradeoffs in terms of liquidity, slippage, and ownership.

Why is 70/30 often considered the default?

A 70/30 split is commonly used as a starting point because it provides reasonable liquidity while still giving the founder a meaningful token position. However, “commonly used” does not mean optimal for every situation. Small budgets might need higher liquidity ratios (80/20) to avoid dangerously thin pools. Large budgets might afford lower ratios (60/40) because even 60% of a large budget creates adequate depth.

What happens at extreme ratios like 95/5 or 50/50?

At 95/5, the pool is very deep but the founder barely owns any tokens: the acquisition buy is too small to acquire meaningful supply. At 50/50, the founder gets maximum ownership but the pool is half as deep, meaning twice the slippage for traders. Both extremes have problems; the simulator helps find the balance point for your specific budget and goals.

← Back to Learn